|
|
|
Useful Documents
|
|
|
|
The Facts You Need To Know
|
How to reach your elected school board members:
Your school district website doesn't tell you, so we will!
| Jeffrey A. Treiber, President | jtreiber at henneman.com |
| Susan E. Rohrman | serohrman at comcast.net |
| Karen M. Hartman | kmhartman25 at comcast.net |
| Joseph T. Seminetta | emptygarage at comcast.net |
| Chris Williams | cwilliams at libwilliams.com |
| Michael Tempest | michael.tempest at comcast.net |
| Philip R. de Rozier | pderbus at comcast.net |
| (Replace the word "at" with "@") |
And since New Trier District 203 is also shy about letting citizens know how to email their elected representatives,
we'll provide that here as well:
| Carol Ducommun, President | csmme01 at aol.com |
| Bob Merrick | ramerrick at sbcglobal.net |
| Jim Koch | jkoch at gkw-law.com |
| Pete Ullman | pullman2 at comcast.net |
| Steve Malkin | newtrier at rangerlp.com |
| Susan Noyes | SBNoYes at aol.com |
| Wendy Serrino | wserrino at aol.com |
| (Replace the word "at" with "@") |
|
About the teachers' union:
The "KENILWORTH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION" is a local union in
Region 37 of the IEA/NEA, the 800-pound gorilla of Illinois special interests.
|
|
The Iowa results are in! District 38 has received detailed results from the ITBS/CogAT of September 2006.
|
|
April 2007: Voters of Kenilworth approve gigantic 24.6% tax increase plus new bonds!
| 24.6% TAX INCREASE |
| Precinct |
Yes |
No |
Total |
Percent Yes |
Percent No |
| 17 |
35 |
17 |
52 |
67.3% |
32.7% |
| 18 |
19 |
12 |
31 |
61.3% |
38.7% |
| 22 |
233 |
227 |
460 |
50.7% |
49.3% |
| 23 |
215 |
146 |
361 |
59.6% |
40.4% |
| 24 |
135 |
119 |
254 |
53.1% |
46.9% |
| 30 |
18 |
5 |
23 |
78.3% |
21.7% |
| Total |
655 |
526 |
1181 |
55.5% |
44.5% |
| ISSUING OF CAPITAL BONDS |
| Precinct |
Yes |
No |
Total |
Percent Yes |
Percent No |
| 17 |
37 |
15 |
52 |
71.2% |
28.8% |
| 18 |
22 |
9 |
31 |
71.0% |
29.0% |
| 22 |
246 |
213 |
459 |
53.6% |
46.4% |
| 23 |
235 |
129 |
364 |
64.6% |
35.4% |
| 24 |
147 |
106 |
253 |
58.1% |
41.9% |
| 30 |
19 |
4 |
23 |
82.6% |
17.4% |
| Total |
706 |
476 |
1182 |
59.7% |
40.3% |
|
| Kenilworth rank among all grade school districts in Illinois in spending per student:
| #4 |
|
Salary hike
given by Kenilworth D38 board to
Union
: |
+22.5%
|
|
Hike in your D38 taxes
due to 2007 referendum:
|
+24.6%
|
|
|
Runaway Spending at D38
|
|
During the 2007 referendum campaign, voters were told that the sudden spike in expenses for 2003-2004
was somehow due to leftover costs associated with the "flood".
Now that we have some additional years of data, we see that the "spike" was not a spike at all, but rather
a clear indicator of spending run wild:
And note that these expenses of more that $15,000 per students are for operating costs alone,
and do not include capital costs!
What's driving these skyrocketing costs? It's clearly D38's rapidly escalating instructional spending:
An amazing discovery about the spending spree is that D38, with a single, small neighborhood K-8 school,
is closing in on matching per student costs with New Trier, a huge, sophisticated high school!
Of the 376 Grade School Districts in Illinois,
Kenilworth Is the 4th Most Expensive!
| Rank | District | Operating Expense Per Pupil |
| 1 |
RONDOUT SD 72 |
$23,001 |
| 2 |
SUNSET RIDGE SD 29 |
$17,659 |
| 3 |
BANNOCKBURN SD 106 |
$17,491 |
| 4 |
KENILWORTH SD 38 |
$16,916 |
| 5 |
NORTHBROOK ESD 27 |
$15,976 |
| 6 |
BUTLER SD 53 |
$15,930 |
| 7 |
AVOCA SD 37 |
$15,674 |
Source:
Illinois State Board of Education, 2006-07
Click here to download complete ISBE spreadsheet
As expected, the school board is asking Kenilworth taxpayers to bail it out yet again!
Who will they blame for the latest crisis?
- Themselves, for approving runaway spending and deficit budgets, precipitating a manufactured crisis, or,
- Anyone who dares to think that $15,000+ per student is way more than enough already and votes "no"
Board gave an extravagently generous 22.5% raise (WOW!) to the UNION:
|
"... 7% overall increase for each year ..."
|
"Dr. Kalinich presented the 2006 - 2008 Contract Agreement with the
Kenilworth Education Association (KEA) noting that the salary schedule reflects a 7% overall increase for
each
year of the schedule ..."
"Mrs. Hartman moved, seconded by Mr. Treiber, to approve, as presented, the 2006 - 2008 Contract Agreement
with the Kenilworth Education Association (KEA). ... Motion carried, 7 to 0."
Source: Minutes of the Board of Education, Kenilworth School District No. 38, June 19, 2006.
With compounding, 7% for each of three years yields a 22.5% raise.
But the school board gave away money they knew they wouldn't have! The board knowingly plunged into deficit spending:
"Mr. Mattern also stated that ... the FY06 budget is a deficit budget ... [and]
future budgets will produce annual deficits..."
Source: Minutes of the Board of Education, Kenilworth School District No. 38, June 20, 2005
As a result of the board's giveaway, a crisis was created:
"Mr. Mattern ... further noted ... the need for another Educational Fund tax rate increase. A recommendation from the
Building and Finance Committee regarding such a tax rate increase will be
presented to the Board during FY06."
Source: Minutes of the Board of Education, Kenilworth School District No. 38, June 20, 2005
"Building and Finance: Continue referendum planning"
"Communication: Conduct pre-referendum planning"
Source: "Areas of Focus 2005-2006," adopted by Board of Education, Kenilworth School District No. 38
"Mrs. Hennessy of William Blair & Company, LLC presented options for operating
tax rate increases, a District current debt service profile, and referendum
options. "
Source: Minutes of the Board of Education, Kenilworth School District No. 38, April 17, 2006
"Never spend your money before you have it."
-- Thomas Jefferson
|
JUDGE FOR YOURSELF!
Are D38 salaries already fair and generous?
-
Average D38 Teacher Salary (2006):
$66,462
-
Complete list of salaries for all administrators and teachers, District 38, 2006, as reported to state
-
Salary Range For Full-Time D38 Teachers, 10 Months (2006):
$39,711 (1 year experience) to $135,956
-
What kinds of pensions can teachers look forward to? (Click here to read more.)
For someone who started teaching at age 21,
and retires at age 55, the state pension is 75% of the average of the last four years of salary.
This is then automatically increased 3% per year.
So, a teacher like this who retires at age 55 from Sears with, say, a 10-month salary
averaging $120,000 in the last four years, can look forward to
$90,000 in checks every year for the rest of his/her life,
with a 3% boost annually.
Important Notes!
-
Most teacher salaries are for ten months of work per year.
- This salary information does NOT include the new series of annual 7% increases granted by the school board.
- Is this an invasion of privacy?
NO! This information is public record, and is readily available. In fact, the Family Taxpayers Network,
which collects this information and puts it on their website, says they get over 200,000 hits per month -- most of that
from Illinois teachers who are very well aware of the site!
- Where does this information come from?
It's taken directly from official state records, and it's all explained
here.
"Following the Dollar," Wilmette Life, December 14, 2006:
Some local superintendents and their compensation, Wilmette Life, December 14, 2006:
| District | Schools | Students | Superintendent | Compensation |
| New Trier High School D203 | 2 | 4,150 | Linda Yonke | $227,150 |
| Kenilworth D38 | 1 | 583 | Kelley Kalinich | $201,900 |
| West Northfield D31 | 2 | 891 | Debra Hill | $183,112 |
| Northbrook/Glenview D30 | 3 | 1,107 | Linda Veith | $173,062 |
This Wilmette Life article also reported on other districts in the area, all of which were larger or much larger
than Kenilworth D38 (with one exception) and paid even more to their superintendents.
(That one exception was Sunset Ridge D29: With only 515 students, why on earth they would
give an astounding $344,921 to their sup, Howard Bultinck,
is a question that their taxpayers should be asking!)
How did our school board respond to such embarrassing publicity? Just FOUR days later ...
"Mr. Jeffrey Treiber moved, seconded by Mrs. Karen Hartman to approve ...
7% salary increase for the Superintendent, Dr. Kelley Kalinich, for the 2006-2007 School Year. ... Motion carried 7 to 0."
Source: Minutes of the Board of Education, Kenilworth School District No. 38, December 18, 2006
Kelley Kalinich's earnings history:
Special report page prepared by Family Taxpayers Network:
Kenilworth School District 38
Average Pay Increases and Estimated Pensions
The following charts measure pay increases, not decreases. They answer a simple
question:"For those full time employees who received more money from the first
year to the last within a time frame, what is the average pay increase?" The
salary data used comes directly from the Illinois State Board of Education.
Our pension calculation is based upon what's possible when an individual is at
least 55 years old with 34 years of service. Those with less than 34 years who
continue to work will, in most cases, have higher pensions than those calculated.
(Be sure to click on the percentages in the tables to see the full lists and the actual dollar amounts!)
|
Does extravagent spending produce better results? Apparently not!
Spending vs. Results in 6 New Trier Feeder Districts
Source: 8th grade, ISAT 2006, data released by ISBE in March 2007.
From left to right, the sets of marks denote:
D39 Wilmette,
D36 Winnetka,
D35 Glencoe,
D37 Avoca,
D38 Kenilworth and
D29 Sunset Ridge.
|
|
Useful Info
|
Higher Taxes Hurt Property Values
School District Finances
-
The Public School Money Drain, editorial, Chicago Tribune, January 3, 2002.
"... Too many school districts ... are unwilling to
change the spending style to which they've become accustomed. They resist
adjusting the often extremely generous and comprehensive benefit packages offered
to teachers, and are loath to demand more rigorous work schedules or restructured
curricula for the higher pay. ..."
-
No Justification For School District Splurging, editorial, Chicago Sun-Times, June 1, 2005.
"... you can only feel one way: mind-blowing outrage. ...
It's school districts across the state. ...
Schools need to start acting like businesses because their stockholders -- the taxpayers -- are wondering how their money is being spent."
-
The Public Schools' Dirty Little Secret
by Jay P. Greene & Marcus A. Winters, July 2, 2004.
"More money for public education? Like apple pie and the flag, everyone's for it.
But, it turns out, only because most Americans don't know how much cash the
schools already get. And, a new survey found,
when they hear how much public
schools now spend per pupil, a clear majority think schools already have enough
to do the job. ..."
-
Does the Tax Cap Hurt Public Education?
"There's been a lot of talk from school districts about how harmful PTELL (the tax
cap) is to their budgets. It has been claimed that school districts "lose" money
because of the tax cap, or that the tax cap prevents districts from collecting
money already approved by voters. These statements simply aren't true."
Read more!
-
The Illinois School Spending Crisis: Bankrupting Taxpayers, Destroying Property Values
by Jack Martin, Chairman, Taxpayers for Good Government.
"The educational establishment says they need more money to fund their programs
and the growing student populations. They cry to the legislature that the tax
caps have hurt them and cost the schools millions of dollars that they would have
been able to levy without voter approval or public accountability.
The plain fact is this: since tax caps were passed in 1991 through the 2004/05
school year, the schools in the State of Illinois have received over ten billion
dollars ($10.69 billion) in additional revenue, more than doubling the revenue
for education.
This gusher of public funding and support for education has doubled and is a 116
percent increase since the tax caps became law. Yet, the education bureaucrats
claim this is not enough. They cannot explain why this amount, which is up
nearly two and a half times the rate of inflation, is insufficient."
-
Illinois schools are NOT Poorly Funded: Testimony to
Illinois Senate Education Committee by Chris Jenner, member of Cary school board.
"Let me cite a few more rankings from the same study, the NEA's Rankings & Estimates:
* Illinois ranks 14th in public school revenue per student...
* Illinois ranks 3rd in public school revenue as a percentage of combined state and
local revenues
* Illinois ranks 25th in state / local spending on education as a percentage of all spending (above national average)
* Illinois ranks 11th in K-12 public school spending per student...
Illinois schools are NOT poorly funded."
-
Introducing the "Golden Handcuff Award"
by Bill Zettler.
"Since teachers have the Golden Apple Award I thought it only appropriate to have
a similar award for politicians called the 'Golden Handcuff Award.' Whereas the
Golden Apple recognizes the highest achievement in the classroom, the Golden
Handcuff would recognize those politicians with the highest achievement in
garnering political contributions from the teacher unions.
I call it the Golden Handcuff because once you have received money from the
unions you are no longer able to lift anything heavier than a five-figure
contribution check. The heavy lifting involved in curbing six-figure teacher
salaries, $300,000 administrators salaries, multi-million dollar pensions,
endless property tax increases, etc. cannot be done when you are encumbered with
the Golden Handcuffs."
-
Citizens For Reasonable And Fair Taxes (CRAFT)
A wealth of resources from this tax-fighting group that serves as an umbrella for people all over
the northern Chicago suburbs who are working to defeat unreasonable school tax hikes.
"Ratcheting" and Salaries
-
The Myth of the Underpaid Teacher, Family Taxpayer Network.
"Despite the fact that taxpayers have continued to increase their funding of the
public schools at substantially higher levels than the rate of inflation, those
responsible for the management of these schools spend recklessly -- including on
teacher and administrator pay increases.
And let's be clear about one of the reasons why that's happening. It's called
ratcheting.
Teachers and administrators all over the state check out each
other's salaries at
www.thechampion.org and then clamour for more for themselves.
Forget student performance or whether the market value of their job fits their
demands. None of that is important. They want more and they want it now -- and
if taxpayers don't do more, that's when the threats start. Cries of poverty are
combined with warnings that extracurriculars will be cut or teachers will strike.
No proof is ever given that what's already being spent isn't enough. Full
financial transparency is avoided by the public school system at all costs. When
some of the facts do get leaked, hardworking taxpayers are disgusted."
-
The New Math: How a 4.63% Raise Becomes an 8.5% Raise
"The Chicago Tribune was good enough to examine the [Chicago] contract using a hypothetical
case of a 5-year veteran with a Master's degree. This teacher, whose current
salary begins at $44,256/yr ends up making $59,820/yr after four years.
But how can this be? After all, one would need an annual increase of over 7.82%
to reach this final pay. That's almost twice the advertised amount.
Simply put, the 4% figure is a distortion based on the details of how teacher pay
is actually computed. Publication of this low number is no accident; it is done
intentionally to minimize public outrage over teacher pay."
Read more!
-
How Much Should a Teacher Make? A Private Sector Equivalency Calculation
by Bill Zettler.
"We believe that teaching is an honorable and well-respected profession and
teachers should be compensated in a manner equivalent to what private sector
peers earn taking into account all fringe benefits. Our argument is that most
teachers, especially those in suburban Chicago, are more than adequately
compensated compared to their equals in the private sector.
Over the last 10 years, due to teachers unions influence on politicians of both
parties, teachers' salaries and benefits have increased to the point where in
many cases they far exceed what the private sector earns. ...
So we will work through a scenario ..."
-
What To Know About Illinois Public School Teacher and Administrator Pay
"What's evident is that the rate of
pay increases and the pension benefits far
outpace anything seen by private sector employees.
Part of the reason for this disparity has to do with the fact that public sector
unions -- in this case, the teacher unions -- operate as a monopoly within a
monopoly."
-
What To Know About Illinois Public School Teacher and Administrator Pensions
by Bill Zettler
-
Illinois Teachers Pay Relative To Other Degreed White-Collar Workers
by Bill Zettler
"Are Illinois teachers underpaid or overpaid relative to other degreed
white-collar workers? The attached chart shows they are overpaid without even
including the value of tenure or million-dollar pensions or 3 months off every
summer.
Did you know there are 6 schools where the average teacher makes about the same
monthly salary as the average MD in General Practice?
Did you know that 63 schools pay a monthly salary greater than the average
dentist in general practice makes?
How about 37 schools paying more than pharmacists, 32 more than Administrative
Law Judges, and 27 more than actuaries.
And hundreds of schools pay more than microbiologists, chemists, chemical
engineers, mechanical engineers, mathematicians, veterinarians, computer
programmers and auditors."
What Districts Aren't Telling
-
The Need for School District Financial Transparency:
What they're disclosing, and what they're not, Family Taxpayer Network.
-
The Champion School Accountability Project, Champion Foundation:
"Illinois taxpayers have greatly increased funding to the public schools for
decades, yet there are never-ending cries for ever higher taxes to pour yet more
dollars into the system. The reason for this is that the schools are terribly
mismanaged, so no amount of money will ever be enough.
The Champion Foundation is committed to requiring all Illinois government-run
school districts to fully disclose all financial information to the public.
Currently, school districts resist efforts to report revenues and expenditures in
a clear, understandable standardized format. This is unacceptable, since there is
no accountability without transparency."
-
How To Successfully Talk To Your Local District About Putting Its Checks Online
by Peyton Wolcott.
"Generally we start out assuming our dealings with our school
districts will be a rational exercise. Most of us are volunteers and
in addition to our taxes give generously to our children's schools.
Then when we spend a lot of time there, we notice things. Years ago I
myself felt sure that if I showed my local supe and board where money
was being wasted in some areas and not adequately safeguarded in
others that they would welcome this information with open arms and
changes would be made on the spot. Hah! Imagine my surprise when
they reacted as though to a personal attack when I was just trying to
help."
The Cavalcade of Threats
-
How Schools Pass Referenda, by Cathy Peschke, Citizens for Reasonable And Fair Taxes (CRAFT).
"Welcome to the cavalcade of threats, program cuts and increased fees all in the name of 'for the kids!'"
-
Testimony to
Illinois Senate Education Committee by Chris Jenner, member of Cary school board.
"How dare school boards agree to employee salaries the districts can't afford,
then go to taxpayers and say, 'Raise your taxes, or we need to cut programs and
teachers.'"
-
Electioneering and Threatening the Customers, Family Taxpayer Network.
Excerpt:
"In recent years pro-referendum supporters
make little attempt to argue that increasing spending improves education.
Instead, their more truthful message is,
'give us more money or we'll make things worse.'
School boards and administrators threatening the people they're supposed to serve
is now common practice. If voters don't give them what they want, the
government-run school districts warn that they will do things like change bell
times, alter bus routes and pickup times, and cut extracurricular activities and
other popular programs.
And the threats are working because people understand that a public school system
capable of decades of mediocrity is certainly capable of shortchanging their kids
even further."
Running a School District
-
The Goodies That Go With Running a School District,
Chicago Sun-Times, July 13, 2003.
"Cars. Retirement bonuses. 'Rabbi trusts.' Double pensions. Even personal
security.
Perks abound for school superintendents, especially those in the suburbs, who
routinely ask for--and get--these extras as part of their employment contracts.
Many of these perks--including bonuses, annuities and stipends-- are considered
income, which ultimately boosts a superintendent's pension." (Click to read the juicy details, including
all about "rabbi trusts" and Kenilworth!)
-
Should a Superintendent Be Paid Like a CEO?
"Superintendents do not do anything even remotely akin to the primary function of
a CEO. Superintendents do not operate in a competitive environment. They do not
establish new markets for anything. They have no competition and so do not have
to steal others' market share. They do not have to employ military strategy, or
in fact any strategy at all, to win or hold market share. Actually,
superintendents' 'markets' are pretty much handed to them on a platter by the
state..." (Click to read full article.)
Computers in Schools?
Promoting a Tax Hike
- Firms' Role In Campaign At Issue:
They Back, Then Profit From School Bond Sale, Chicago Tribune,
March 1, 2007.
"Some of the companies that pushed for passage of a $94 million bond issue for
Glenbrook High School District 225 are benefiting financially from November's
successful campaign. ... William Blair & Co., a Chicago financial firm, advised
school officials on how to promote the bond measure and will earn at least
$130,000 in fees resulting from bond sales, Schilling said. The company gave
$4,000 to the vote-yes campaign. ... Elizabeth Hennessy, principal at William
Blair & Co., said the firm has acted as underwriter for many school districts."
-
FAQ on Referendums and the State Officials and Employee Ethics Act,
Illinois Council of School Attorneys, February 2007.
The Ethics Act prohibits State employees and officials from engaging in certain
political activities ... the Ethics Act's prohibitions apply to
board members and employees, including its ban on engaging in "prohibited
political activity" in certain situations and in particular, during school
employment hours.
Do "prohibited political activities" include referendum-related activities?
Yes. The Ethics Act's definition of "prohibited political activity" includes many referendum-related activities, such
as:
- Planning, conducting, or participating in a public opinion poll ... for or against any referendum question.
- Soliciting votes ... for or against any referendum question or helping in an effort to get voters to the polls.
- Initiating for circulation, preparing, circulating, reviewing, or filing a petition ... for or against any referendum
question.
- Distributing, preparing for distribution, or mailing campaign literature, campaign signs, or other campaign
material ... for or against any referendum question.
- Campaigning ... for or against any referendum question.
- Managing or working on a campaign ... for or against any referendum question.
What types of referendum-related activities are school employees prohibited from conducting?
Employees are prohibited from supporting a referendum during any time they are being compensated
("compensated time"). When an employee is being compensated is easy to determine for an hourly employee,
but more difficult for a salaried employee. High-ranking, salaried employees must carefully consider their actions
on a case-by-case basis.
During compensated time or on district property, a school employee should not wear a button pro- or antireferendum,
distribute pro-referendum brochures, ask others how they plan to vote, distribute pencils or other
favors with advocacy messages, or engage in any other activity in support of or opposition to the referendum.
- State of Illinois,
Election Interference Act:
(10 ILCS 5/9-25.1) Sec. 9-25.1. Election interference.
- As used in this
Section, "public funds" means any funds appropriated by the Illinois General
Assembly or by any political subdivision of the State of Illinois.
- No public funds shall be used to urge any elector to vote for or against any candidate or
proposition, or be appropriated for political or campaign purposes to any
candidate or political organization. ...
- The first time any person
violates any provision of this Section, that person shall be guilty of a Class B
misdemeanor. Upon the second or any subsequent violation of any provision of
this Section, the person violating any provision of this Section shall be guilty
of a Class A misdemeanor.
|